Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
The Left?s Foreign Interference Problem Wed Dec 04, 2024 07:00 | Charlotte Gill The British Left is in uproar over the possibility that Elon Musk will donate ?79m to Reform. But, says Charlotte Gill, the British Left has been happy to accept money from Joe Biden's?Government.
The post The Left’s Foreign Interference Problem appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
News Round-Up Wed Dec 04, 2024 00:49 | Richard Eldred A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ?climate emergency?, public health ?crises? and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.
The post News Round-Up appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
How Lockdown Broke the Will to Work Tue Dec 03, 2024 19:00 | Sallust The former boss of Waitrose, Lord Price, has blamed lockdowns for annihilating the will of many Britons to go to work. Many workers are now fixated on maximising sick pay and doing as little as possible.
The post How Lockdown Broke the Will to Work appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
?I Love Jesus? Rainbow Armband Earns Marc Guehi Formal Reprimand from FA Tue Dec 03, 2024 17:00 | Will Jones Marc Guehi?and Crystal Palace will be formally reprimanded by the FA after the player wrote "I love Jesus" on his rainbow armband because of a ban on "religious and political images". No ban on holy Pride though.
The post “I Love Jesus” Rainbow Armband Earns Marc Guehi Formal Reprimand from FA appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Has Donald Trump Ended Woke? Tue Dec 03, 2024 15:00 | Richard Eldred The age of woke is over, says Nick Dixon. The time of MAGA has come! But will the British political class wake up and smell the coffee?
The post Has Donald Trump Ended Woke? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
What is changing in the Middle East , by Thierry Meyssan Tue Dec 03, 2024 07:08 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?110 Fri Nov 29, 2024 15:01 | en
Verbal ceasefire in Lebanon Fri Nov 29, 2024 14:52 | en
Russia Prepares to Respond to the Armageddon Wanted by the Biden Administration ... Tue Nov 26, 2024 06:56 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?109 Fri Nov 22, 2024 14:00 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
IPSC condemns Irish expenditure on Israeli military equipment
national |
rights, freedoms and repression |
press release
Sunday April 04, 2010 15:37 by Fintan Lane - IPSC media officer 087 1258325
IRELAND-PALESTINE SOLIDARITY CAMPAIGN
PRESS RELEASE, 4/1/10
IPSC demands an end to Irish Defence Forces expenditure on Israeli arms
The Ireland-Palestine Solidarity Campaign (IPSC) is reiterating its call on the Irish Department of Defence to end all spending on equipment and armaments manufactured by Israeli firms. This comes in the wake of the further exposure in today's Sunday Tribune of the extent of Irish army spending on Israeli equipment.
There is an ongoing international human rights campaign - called for by Palestinian civil society - of Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) against the apartheid Israeli state. The IPSC is at the forefront of this campaign in Ireland and regularly organises events in support of BDS.
According to today's Sunday Tribune, the Irish army has spent almost €14 million in the past five years on equipment made by Israeli manufacturers. One company that has received Irish taxpayers' money is Israeli company Elbit Systems, which has lucrative contracts with the Israeli military and provides surveillance equipment for the notorious apartheid wall in the West Bank. Last September, Norway divested its pension fund investments in Elbit Systems due to ethical concerns over its work on the West Bank separation wall.
The IPSC is calling on the Irish government to end on all contracts and connections with Israeli companies, and also reiterates its demand that the Irish army should not purchase bullets from Israel.
According to IPSC chairperson Dr David Landy: "The recent revelation that the Irish Government is considering purchasing millions of euros worth of bullets from Israel Military Industries is deeply shocking. It is also hugely disturbing that the Irish army has dealings with a company such as Elbit Systems which is deeply involved in providing the surveillence infrastructure for the apartheid wall in the West Bank. We find it completely inappropriate that the Irish State would purchase weapons and equipment from companies intimately linked to the Israeli armed forces, esppecially those that supply the means by which the war crimes documented by the Goldstone Report are committed. Furthermore, we feel that, at a time when Israel is facing unprecedented criticism for its continued defiance of international law, such a purchase of arms sends entirely the wrong message to the Israeli state and the international community."
He continued: "The extent of Irish army expenditure on Israeli military equipment is disturbing and, on the face of it, appears to reveal a disconnent between the Department of Defence and the Department of Foreigns Affairs. In recent months, Michael Martin has been forthrightly condemnatory of the Israeli siege of Gaza, yet our own army is allowed to fund the Israeli arms industry to the tune of millions of euros. This is unacceptable. Not a single penny of Irish taxpayers' money should be used to bolster the rogue Israeli state."
PRESS RELEASE ENDS
For further information, phone Dr David Landy (IPSC chairperson) at XXXXX, or Dr Fintan Lane (IPSC media officer) at 087 1258325.
|
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (4 of 4)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4ALL TRADE between EU states and Israel should cease immediately in view of the alleged war crimes committed in Gaza and the cover-up by the Israeli military. That should include dealing with Israeli companies registered in EU member states.
Terrorizing the civilian population in Gaza by the killing of non-combatants is a crime under international law.
The dropping of hundreds of thousands of illegal cluster bombs in southern Lebanon was a deliberate action to permanently contaminate the country, and was also a war crime. 90% of these bombs were dropped after the cease-fire agreed with the UN.
The world cannot continue to deal with a state that continues to act in this barbarous manner and then has the audacity to claim to be democratic.
If this is the case then Ireland should not trade with the us or Britain!!!
But in under law Ireland has to tender contracts and take the best price. If an isreali company has the best offer then the defence forces are obliged to take it!
Hi Mark, in fact there is no legal obligation to buy arms from Israel. I'm not surprised you think there is, because this is the line our government puts out. The department. of foreign affairs, whenever we or TDs have asked questions about their purchase of Israeli arms always use the fact that they are 'obliged to' use the EDA Code of Conduct on Defence Procurement, (and under this code there's no reason not to buy weapons from Israel).
However this is simply incorrect - the code is explicitly a "voluntary, non-binding agreement" which involves "no legal commitment", and states that "in all cases, the final authority for contract award remains with [member states'] national authorities". Furthermore, the Code is an agreement between EU member states, not including Israel, with the declared aim of maximizing opportunities for "suppliers based on each others' territories". On no interpretation can this agreement be presented as compelling Ireland to open its procurement competitions to any Israeli arms company. Companies excluded from the outset incur no costs in tendering, and thus have no legal cause of action.
What this boils down to is that our government is buying bullets from Israel because it wants to, not because it's legally obliged to.
While I dont disagree that they are a less than savoury bidder I do wonder if you would support spending more tax payers money to buy from the second cheapest bidder? (Presuming of course that the decision was based purely on cost, it may well have been based on the product itself for all I know)