Worker & Community Struggles and Protests Madrid Police "Dumbfounded" After Amazon Called The Cops On Striking Workers 22:31 Nov 27 0 comments George Soros’ Open Society Foundation unmasked in a major leak 22:31 Aug 24 1 comments Shell in court over major Corrib gas refinery flaring events. 23:32 Jul 28 0 comments Eddie Hobbs: Largest act of larceny against Irish people 23:22 Jun 02 0 comments CHASE Fundraising Events Calendar for June 23:10 Jun 01 0 comments more >>Blog Feeds
The SakerA bird's eye view of the vineyard
Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Public InquiryInterested in maladministration. Estd. 2005RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony Waiting for SIPO Anthony
Human Rights in IrelandPromoting Human Rights in Ireland
Lockdown Skeptics
Loophole in Labour?s New Puberty Blockers Ban Will See Vulnerable Children Used As ?Guinea Pigs to T... Sun Dec 15, 2024 19:00 | Richard Eldred
Bid to Build Britain?s Biggest Muslim Cemetery Sun Dec 15, 2024 17:00 | Richard Eldred
Number of Civilians Killed in Gaza ?Inflated to Vilify Israel? Sun Dec 15, 2024 15:00 | Richard Eldred
Shock Revelation: The U.K. Doesn?t Have Enough Workers to Build Labour?s 1.5 Million New Homes Sun Dec 15, 2024 13:00 | Sallust
Labour Gives Green Light for ?Activist? Councils to Rename Streets With Links to Empire Sun Dec 15, 2024 11:00 | Richard Eldred |
The workers and IMPACT
national |
worker & community struggles and protests |
opinion/analysis
Tuesday March 24, 2009 14:50 by PADDY HACKETT
Little confidence left in the Unions Bad leadership within IMPACT is the cause of the failure of that union . The rejection of strike action by the membership of IMPACT is a reflection of at least one thing. |
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (6 of 6)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6I would suggest that the strike ballot was not voted down. 65% of those balloted were in favour. It is the nature of IMPACT as a union crippled by bureaucracy and undemocratic rules by which a 2/3 majority is needed to pass a strike ballot that is to blame.
It is far too simplistic to conclude that workers in IMPACT did not vote overwhelmingly for the National Strike because of their Trade Union 'leaders'. As much as I am disappointed that it was not carried I am not hugely surprised. It is futile blaming the leaders. A more detailed and nuanced analysis is required if we genuinely want to build a successful labour movement in the current crisis. It is building this movement of labour, aimed at a complete restructuring of the societal organisation of work that is important. To achieve it there has to be an honest evaluation of the Irish labour force.
Public sector workers (particularly civil servants) are extremely conservative. Public sector unions reflect this political conservativism. They generally view themselves as service providers, and reflect the hierarchical nature of public sector organisations. Horizontal organisation is the absolute opposite of how this sector operates. Public sector workers are used to a situation whereby they passively allow their 'leaders' make decisions for them. This is not the fault of the trade union leaders; it is a reflection of how they operate in their day to day workplace. Their members pay a fee and they bargain for better wages. They are not remotely interested in workplace democracy and certainly not interested in a full blown class struggle. Anybody who has experience of the trade union movement will be fully aware of this conservativism.
Political studies have conclusively shown that public sector workers vote overwhelmingly for Fianna Fail, and have done so for over twenty five years. The most that public sector workers will contribute toward class-struggle is shifting their electorate preference toward Labour (hardly radical). But, it is a reflection of the political consciousness of the Irish public sector. The fact that 40 % did not turn out to vote in the IMPACT ballot speaks more than the 65% who did vote. Overall, less than 40 per cent can be accurately said to have voted for strike action. The harsh reality is that whilst the pension levy is extremely inequitable it does not hugely affect the upper echelons of the public sector. Middle managers whilst disappointed that they have lost disposable income are not so pissed off that they want an all out strike. They recognise they have a relatively secure job (and I exclude any new teachers, and those employed over the past 24 months etc from this 'security) and will most likely express their 'class consciousness' through the ballot box by voting Fianna Fail out of office. This is about the full extent of 'radicalism' we can expect from a huge section of the public sector workforce.
The rejection of participation in a national strike by IMPACT members is now a social fact and it is more important to build support in sectors of the Irish workforce that will favour a national strike.
On a more theoretical level: The real position which differentiates me from traditional Marxist analyses of 'class struggle' is my conviction that even with the methods of the classical critique of political economy, we cannot make precise economic predictions today: for these presuppose an autonomous, self-reproducing economic system. Just because capitalism is in crisis and is contracting it does not mean that workers will inevitably collectively favour an anti-capitalist outcome. I do not believe in a Marxist self-reproducing system that informs most 'class-struggle' analyses. The laws governing the contemporary economy are no longer identical with those analysed by Marx. This does not mean that his analysis of its mechanisms is inaccurate, but rather that this analysis only remains valid so long as the intervention of the political system is ignored. The political system will not ignore the capitalist crisis. In the 1930's we ended up with Fascism in Germany and the New Deal in the US not a classless society.
The state will mediate class struggle and diversify its effects. The lines of battle have been fundamentally restructured over the past 50 years. The classical arch-type form of class struggle is not a useful tool for the contemporary situation we are in. We need new analyses if we want to build a new Labour movement. We need new tools, new strategies and new analysis. Blaming IMPACT leaders for the failure of their members to participate in a national strike is rhetorical and not useful if we really want to build change.
Please note that 65% of IMPACT members who took part in the ballot voted in favour of strike action. CPSU, PSEU, TUI, INTO, INO, ASTI have all voted in favour of strike action.
Both 'Hackett' and 'A.R' are talking crap! The fact is that as 'Albatrot' and 'Jerry Cornelius' have already pointed out had you bothered to read their comments is that 65% of IMPACT members who took part in the ballot voted in favour of strike action Hardly sounds like rejection to me 'Hackett' and 'A.R'. That's A MAJORITY to me, and a large majority too! Also SIPTU, TEEU, CPSU, PSEU, TUI, INTO, INO, ASTI have all voted in favour of strike action. That's lots of Unions represting MANY different groups of Workers, BOTH Public AND Private Sector Workers. March 30th IS GOING Ahead, EVEN IF ICTU do stab us in the back. Unofficially if necessary, and maybe that's not a bad thing as it'll free us from the cancer of conservative Trade Union leaders. Roll on next Monday.
Approximately 5,000 members didn't even receive ballot papers. Some were'nt even informed of next Monday. Impact were reliant on a passive membership and when the union leadership had to deliver results to Congress they proved they couldnt muster up that result.
If everyone had been balloted properly the result would have been different. But posters have been accurate. Impact did not reject the strike. There was a fraction of 1% below the required 2/3. Indymedia is assisting the main stream media by repeating the same guff that Impact rejected the strike and implying that there isn't wide support for strike action. 35% were opposed to industrial action. That does not mean that Impact members are not in favour of strike action, thay just didn't hit that 66% rule. So look a little bit behind the facts to get to the truth.
Albitrot’s claim that it “is the nature of IMPACT as a union crippled by bureaucracy and undemocratic rules” that is to blame is actually another reason for supporting my view that the leadership of IMPACT is the problem of the working class. It is the reason the vote for strike action turned out as it did and as to why the union has a bureaucratic undemocratic character.
AR’s criticism of the conservative nature of IMPACT as a union supports my very claim that the leadership of IMPACT is responsible for the failure of the union to reach its two thirds majority to get the motion for strike action through. And if it is true that around five thousand of its members received no ballot papers, as one contributor by the pseudonym “Impact member” suggests, then this constitutes further evidence of the correctness of my claim that the leadership is reactionary and needs to be replaced.