New Events

National

no events posted in last week

Blog Feeds

The Saker
A bird's eye view of the vineyard

offsite link Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz
Alternative site: https://thesaker.si/saker-a... Site was created using the downloads provided Regards Herb

offsite link The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker
Dear friends As I have previously announced, we are now “freezing” the blog.? We are also making archives of the blog available for free download in various formats (see below).?

offsite link What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker
by Mr. Allen for the Saker blog Over the last few years, we hear leaders from both Russia and China pronouncing that they have formed a relationship where there are

offsite link Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader
2023/02/27 19:00:02Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of

offsite link The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker
Pepe Escobar for the Saker blog A powerful feeling rhythms your skin and drums up your soul as you?re immersed in a long walk under persistent snow flurries, pinpointed by

The Saker >>

Public Inquiry
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005

offsite link RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony

offsite link Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony

offsite link Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony

offsite link RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony

offsite link Waiting for SIPO Anthony

Public Inquiry >>

Human Rights in Ireland
Promoting Human Rights in Ireland

Human Rights in Ireland >>

Lockdown Skeptics

The Daily Sceptic

offsite link Loophole in Labour?s New Puberty Blockers Ban Will See Vulnerable Children Used As ?Guinea Pigs to T... Sun Dec 15, 2024 19:00 | Richard Eldred
Despite a ban on puberty blockers for children, a loophole will still allow minors to participate in clinical trials, raising concerns that vulnerable youngsters are being used as "guinea pigs" for dangerous drugs.
The post Loophole in Labour?s New Puberty Blockers Ban Will See Vulnerable Children Used As ?Guinea Pigs to Test Harmful Gender Drugs? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Bid to Build Britain?s Biggest Muslim Cemetery Sun Dec 15, 2024 17:00 | Richard Eldred
The billionaire Issa brothers have provoked fury with their plans to build Britain's biggest Muslim cemetery, a colossal 45-acre site in Lancashire.
The post Bid to Build Britain?s Biggest Muslim Cemetery appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Number of Civilians Killed in Gaza ?Inflated to Vilify Israel? Sun Dec 15, 2024 15:00 | Richard Eldred
A damning new report has exposed how Gaza's Health Ministry inflated casualty figures by misclassifying victims and counting unrelated deaths, fuelling a false narrative that Israel is deliberately targeting civilians.
The post Number of Civilians Killed in Gaza ?Inflated to Vilify Israel? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Shock Revelation: The U.K. Doesn?t Have Enough Workers to Build Labour?s 1.5 Million New Homes Sun Dec 15, 2024 13:00 | Sallust
Labour's promise of 1.5 million new homes is a pipe dream destined to fail, says Sallust, with no workers, no skills and no plan to back it up.
The post Shock Revelation: The U.K. Doesn?t Have Enough Workers to Build Labour?s 1.5 Million New Homes appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

offsite link Labour Gives Green Light for ?Activist? Councils to Rename Streets With Links to Empire Sun Dec 15, 2024 11:00 | Richard Eldred
Labour has given the green light for "activist" councils to rename streets tied to slavery and the Empire, quietly scrapping plans to let residents veto the changes.
The post Labour Gives Green Light for ?Activist? Councils to Rename Streets With Links to Empire appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.

Lockdown Skeptics >>

The workers and IMPACT

category national | worker & community struggles and protests | opinion/analysis author Tuesday March 24, 2009 14:50author by PADDY HACKETT Report this post to the editors

Little confidence left in the Unions

Bad leadership within IMPACT is the cause of the failure of that union .

The rejection of strike action by the membership of IMPACT is a reflection of at least one thing.

The action was voted down because many of its members are unhappy witht the way in which the IMPACT official leadership and the official leadership of the trade union movement as a whole is leading its membership. There is little confidence in the existing union leadership. The character of the trade union leadership is such as to obstruct the working class in the struggle to defend living standards. They have failed miserably to effectively engage in the propaganda war against the working class. Trade union representatives hardly exploit the media to get the correct message across. Consequently they let diverse opposition elemeents take over tv, radio and print. Just listen to the Joe Duffy show to get a evidence of this.

Leading up to the big march in Dublin the ICTU had hardly did much to actively publicise and encourage attendance at the march. They prefer to engage in secret talks with government and employer representatives concerning so called social partnership. Social partnership is merely a means to restrain wages and force workers to work more intensively. The union leadership has been deliberately damping down opposition against the government in the hope that it will reward them with a privately negotiated deal to effectively betray workers.

Neither Fianna Fail, the Green Party, Fine Gael nor The Labour Party are against making workers pay for the economic depression. Each only differ as to how to make them pay. Even the trade union leadership is not against the imposition of taxes on workers nor cuts in wages. They merely call for fairness. But "fairness" means nothing. It is merely a word designed to fool the workers into accepting cuts in living standards.

The working class needs to break with the union leadership replacing it with a leadership that advances its class interests.

Paddy Hackett

Related Link: http://patrickhackett.blogspot.com
author by Albatrotpublication date Tue Mar 24, 2009 15:47author address author phone Report this post to the editors

I would suggest that the strike ballot was not voted down. 65% of those balloted were in favour. It is the nature of IMPACT as a union crippled by bureaucracy and undemocratic rules by which a 2/3 majority is needed to pass a strike ballot that is to blame.

author by A.Rpublication date Tue Mar 24, 2009 17:33author address author phone Report this post to the editors


It is far too simplistic to conclude that workers in IMPACT did not vote overwhelmingly for the National Strike because of their Trade Union 'leaders'. As much as I am disappointed that it was not carried I am not hugely surprised. It is futile blaming the leaders. A more detailed and nuanced analysis is required if we genuinely want to build a successful labour movement in the current crisis. It is building this movement of labour, aimed at a complete restructuring of the societal organisation of work that is important. To achieve it there has to be an honest evaluation of the Irish labour force.

Public sector workers (particularly civil servants) are extremely conservative. Public sector unions reflect this political conservativism. They generally view themselves as service providers, and reflect the hierarchical nature of public sector organisations. Horizontal organisation is the absolute opposite of how this sector operates. Public sector workers are used to a situation whereby they passively allow their 'leaders' make decisions for them. This is not the fault of the trade union leaders; it is a reflection of how they operate in their day to day workplace. Their members pay a fee and they bargain for better wages. They are not remotely interested in workplace democracy and certainly not interested in a full blown class struggle. Anybody who has experience of the trade union movement will be fully aware of this conservativism.

Political studies have conclusively shown that public sector workers vote overwhelmingly for Fianna Fail, and have done so for over twenty five years. The most that public sector workers will contribute toward class-struggle is shifting their electorate preference toward Labour (hardly radical). But, it is a reflection of the political consciousness of the Irish public sector. The fact that 40 % did not turn out to vote in the IMPACT ballot speaks more than the 65% who did vote. Overall, less than 40 per cent can be accurately said to have voted for strike action. The harsh reality is that whilst the pension levy is extremely inequitable it does not hugely affect the upper echelons of the public sector. Middle managers whilst disappointed that they have lost disposable income are not so pissed off that they want an all out strike. They recognise they have a relatively secure job (and I exclude any new teachers, and those employed over the past 24 months etc from this 'security) and will most likely express their 'class consciousness' through the ballot box by voting Fianna Fail out of office. This is about the full extent of 'radicalism' we can expect from a huge section of the public sector workforce.

The rejection of participation in a national strike by IMPACT members is now a social fact and it is more important to build support in sectors of the Irish workforce that will favour a national strike.

On a more theoretical level: The real position which differentiates me from traditional Marxist analyses of 'class struggle' is my conviction that even with the methods of the classical critique of political economy, we cannot make precise economic predictions today: for these presuppose an autonomous, self-reproducing economic system. Just because capitalism is in crisis and is contracting it does not mean that workers will inevitably collectively favour an anti-capitalist outcome. I do not believe in a Marxist self-reproducing system that informs most 'class-struggle' analyses. The laws governing the contemporary economy are no longer identical with those analysed by Marx. This does not mean that his analysis of its mechanisms is inaccurate, but rather that this analysis only remains valid so long as the intervention of the political system is ignored. The political system will not ignore the capitalist crisis. In the 1930's we ended up with Fascism in Germany and the New Deal in the US not a classless society.

The state will mediate class struggle and diversify its effects. The lines of battle have been fundamentally restructured over the past 50 years. The classical arch-type form of class struggle is not a useful tool for the contemporary situation we are in. We need new analyses if we want to build a new Labour movement. We need new tools, new strategies and new analysis. Blaming IMPACT leaders for the failure of their members to participate in a national strike is rhetorical and not useful if we really want to build change.

author by Jerry Corneliuspublication date Tue Mar 24, 2009 18:44author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Please note that 65% of IMPACT members who took part in the ballot voted in favour of strike action. CPSU, PSEU, TUI, INTO, INO, ASTI have all voted in favour of strike action.

author by Voice of Reasonpublication date Wed Mar 25, 2009 00:54author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Both 'Hackett' and 'A.R' are talking crap! The fact is that as 'Albatrot' and 'Jerry Cornelius' have already pointed out had you bothered to read their comments is that 65% of IMPACT members who took part in the ballot voted in favour of strike action Hardly sounds like rejection to me 'Hackett' and 'A.R'. That's A MAJORITY to me, and a large majority too! Also SIPTU, TEEU, CPSU, PSEU, TUI, INTO, INO, ASTI have all voted in favour of strike action. That's lots of Unions represting MANY different groups of Workers, BOTH Public AND Private Sector Workers. March 30th IS GOING Ahead, EVEN IF ICTU do stab us in the back. Unofficially if necessary, and maybe that's not a bad thing as it'll free us from the cancer of conservative Trade Union leaders. Roll on next Monday.

author by Impact memberpublication date Wed Mar 25, 2009 09:44author address author phone Report this post to the editors

Approximately 5,000 members didn't even receive ballot papers. Some were'nt even informed of next Monday. Impact were reliant on a passive membership and when the union leadership had to deliver results to Congress they proved they couldnt muster up that result.

If everyone had been balloted properly the result would have been different. But posters have been accurate. Impact did not reject the strike. There was a fraction of 1% below the required 2/3. Indymedia is assisting the main stream media by repeating the same guff that Impact rejected the strike and implying that there isn't wide support for strike action. 35% were opposed to industrial action. That does not mean that Impact members are not in favour of strike action, thay just didn't hit that 66% rule. So look a little bit behind the facts to get to the truth.

author by Paddy Hackettpublication date Wed Mar 25, 2009 21:47author email rasherrs at eircom dot netauthor address author phone Report this post to the editors

Albitrot’s claim that it “is the nature of IMPACT as a union crippled by bureaucracy and undemocratic rules” that is to blame is actually another reason for supporting my view that the leadership of IMPACT is the problem of the working class. It is the reason the vote for strike action turned out as it did and as to why the union has a bureaucratic undemocratic character.

AR’s criticism of the conservative nature of IMPACT as a union supports my very claim that the leadership of IMPACT is responsible for the failure of the union to reach its two thirds majority to get the motion for strike action through. And if it is true that around five thousand of its members received no ballot papers, as one contributor by the pseudonym “Impact member” suggests, then this constitutes further evidence of the correctness of my claim that the leadership is reactionary and needs to be replaced.

Related Link: http://paddy-hackett.blogspot.com/
Number of comments per page
  
 
© 2001-2024 Independent Media Centre Ireland. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Independent Media Centre Ireland. Disclaimer | Privacy