Dublin no events posted in last week
 North Korea Increases Aid to Russia, Mos... Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
Trump Assembles a War Cabinet Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
Slavgrinder Ramps Up Into Overdrive Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
?Existential? Culling to Continue on Com... Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:28 | Marko Marjanovi?
US to Deploy Military Contractors to Ukr... Sun Nov 10, 2024 02:37 | Field Empty Anti-Empire >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
Musk Says Farage ?Doesn?t Have What It Takes? to Lead Reform Sun Jan 05, 2025 18:00 | Richard Eldred
In a twist that left the nation on the edge of its seat, Elon Musk has sensationally called for Nigel Farage to be removed as leader of Reform UK.
The post Musk Says Farage ?Doesn?t Have What It Takes? to Lead Reform appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Why Is Labour Focusing on Saving the Planet When Birkenhead Is Rapidly Becoming a Third World Slum? Sun Jan 05, 2025 16:00 | Dr David McGrogan
Birkenhead is a town where past pride meets present decline, as lofty promises of progress clash with harsh reality. The contrast between the two couldn't be starker, says Dr David McGrogan.
The post Why Is Labour Focusing on Saving the Planet When Birkenhead Is Rapidly Becoming a Third World Slum? appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Forget About Climate Change. The Real Existential Threat to the Our Future is Babygeddon Sun Jan 05, 2025 14:00 | Sallust
In the Daily Sceptic, Sallust says the West's below replacement level birth rate is a far, far greater threat to our future than climate change. And this depressing Labour Government will only make things worse.
The post Forget About Climate Change. The Real Existential Threat to the Our Future is Babygeddon appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Labour?s ?Anti-Corruption? Minister Spent Years Living in House Given to Her Family by Ally of Forme... Sun Jan 05, 2025 12:02 | Toby Young
Labour's anti-corruption minister used to live in a flat gifted to her sister by a political ally of her aunt, the ex-PM of Bangladesh. This is in addition to the flat she was gifted by another ally of her aunt's.
The post Labour?s ?Anti-Corruption? Minister Spent Years Living in House Given to Her Family by Ally of Former Bangladeshi Prime Minister (Who?s Also Her Aunt) appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Universities Have Been Made Racist by Courses Focused on ?Undertakings of White People? Sun Jan 05, 2025 09:00 | Will Jones
Degree courses focused on the?"undertakings of white people"?have made universities racist, according to a review by a?Russell Group?university that has pledged to make reparations in response.
The post Universities Have Been Made Racist by Courses Focused on “Undertakings of White People” appeared first on The Daily Sceptic. Lockdown Skeptics >>
Voltaire, international edition
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?113 Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:42 | en
Pentagon could create a second Kurdish state Fri Dec 20, 2024 10:31 | en
How Washington and Ankara Changed the Regime in Damascus , by Thierry Meyssan Tue Dec 17, 2024 06:58 | en
Statement by President Bashar al-Assad on the Circumstances Leading to his Depar... Mon Dec 16, 2024 13:26 | en
Voltaire, International Newsletter N?112 Fri Dec 13, 2024 15:34 | en Voltaire Network >>
|
The Myth of the Pan-European Army
 dublin |
anti-war / imperialism |
opinion/analysis
 Friday June 06, 2008 12:32 by Andy McNab
Fantasy versus reality
Opponents of the Lisbon Treaty claim that Ireland will become part of a Pan-European Army.
However their hysteria betrays a profound ignorance of our military weaknesses and indeed the military weakness of the European armies even the big three, German, France and the United Kingdom.
None of the European armies shows any likelihood of being able to overcome nationalistic rivalries, duplication of resources, linguistic difficulties and a plethora of different weapons systems that would make a Pan-European army exist anywhere except in the fantasies of Brussels bureacrats even if a common defence treaty is made official. The US military has standardised its rank structure, uniforms and weapons.
The US Navy and US Air Force uses the F-18 Hornet.
The US Marines and US Army use the same types of helmet, rifle, squad machine gun, anti-tank weapons, armoured personnel carriers and tanks and ammunition.
Most importantly every member speaks English.
Members come from each of the 50 states and each identifies with the US above his home state.
Each is a volunteer.
There is no compulsory military service in the US.
Contrast that with the British, French and German armies who use the Challenger, Leclerc and Leopard series tanks respectively.
British soldiers use the SA-80 rifle, French troops use the FAMAS and German troops use the Heckler & Koch G36.
Former Eastern European Warsaw Pact nations such as Poland who continue to use Kalashnikov rifles and Russian manufactured T-72 tanks. Each army has a dinstive rank structure, proud nationalist tradition, customs and of course different field uniform.
The Irish Army uses the Steyr rifle and the Mowag Piranha armoured personnel carrier but it does not posses main battle tanks, attack helicopters or armoured mobile artillery.
The 27 nations in Europe use many languages, use a bewildering different range of incompatible weapons and each are fiercely nationalistic.
There is no likelihood that a Pan-European Army could be fielded in battle in the same way as the US, Chinese or Russian armies.
The logistical problems of supplying the right type of ammunition for their different weapons is a nightmare.
If a British armoured vehicle breaks down it cannot be stripped for spare parts to be used by a French vehicle or a Polish vehicle.
For a commander of a field army to constantly switch to French, Polish, Hungarian, Italian or Slovenian to communicate with his subordinate commanders would make a mockery of command and control.
The US military has discovered the their cost the ineffectiveness of various European commands in Iraq.
As public opinion changed in Italy, Spain and Poland those nations withdrew their troops.
If the highly centralised patriotic Russian or Chinese army with standardised weapons and a streamlined command structure ever fought with a disorganised internally divided Pan-European Army the battle would be decided before it even began.
The Irish government has only three Army Brigades at is disposal.
At anyone time we only have the resources to field a battalion of infantry on UN duty.
We simply do not have the resources to afford the arms expenditure of other EU states.
It is obvious that our military commitment to a Pan-European Army would be of little significance.
Our troops would likely be assigned to security rather than to front line duties.
|
printable version
Digg this
del.icio.us
Furl
Reddit
Technorati
Facebook
Gab
Twitter
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (7 of 7)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7This is a pointless piece of writing that seems to be a response to a scenario that only exists in the author's own head.
No contributor to Indymedia - opponents of the Lisbon Treaty or not - claims that Europeans would fight right next to each other on the very same battle ground in the same unit. A pan-European army would be comprised of different divisions capable of separate and independent operations and only the commanders of the different divisions would have to co-ordinate their activities. The scenario posited above where soldiers speaking different languages and using very different equipment would be serving in the same units is just so preposterous that no political organisation has suggested it.
On the other hand, increased military co-operation between the military forces of European states and the formation of EU battlegroups under the direct control of the European Union has been a reality for the past three and a half years.
Actually there is a lengthy submission in today's Irish Times on exactly this issue, and the distortions of the treaty that have been peddled by various groups. Go to the Referendum Commission's FAQ http://www.lisbontreaty2008.ie/lisbon_treaty_terms.html for a short summary of the facts. See European Defence Agency, The Solidarity Clause and Mutual Assistance
The second of these begins If the Treaty of Lisbon were ratified then the "Solidarity Clause" would become part of EU law. It provides that the EU and Member States are obliged to assist any Member State if it is the object of a terrorist attack or a natural or man-made disaster. The EU would be obliged to mobilise all the instruments at its disposal, including the military resources made available by the Member States...", but read the full text and not this one paragraph out of context.
You just proved my point:
"A pan-European army would be comprised of different divisions capable of separate and independent operations and only the commanders of the different divisions would have to co-ordinate their activities."
Like I said already the units within each of the American, Russian and Chinese armies are completely integrated with the same command structure, the same ethos and the same weapons platforms.
A Pan-European with divided commands, divided nationalities, duplication of roles, different weapons and different languages is not going to be as effective. A complete logistical nightmare.
A Pan-European army competing with the armies of the other superpowers is a complete fantasy in the minds of military imperialists or paranoid leftists.
I'm sure your delusions make sense to them.
How can the EU Army you rave about 'compete' with the US, when practically every EU country, except maybe France, is occupied to a greater or lesser extent by the US military?
Would it not make more sense to boot out the Yankee occupier from all these countries before starting to talk about an EU constitution, army or sovreignty?
Have the bosses EU not already gotten around the issue of different national and historical differences in their military throught the use of battlegroups that are to be expanded after (or despite) the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty
Where there is a will there is a way.
look up a history book.There are damn few places where The "yankee occupier" is or was in Europe.They were mostly in Germany,southern half.Now there are only somthing like 10% of the original strengthof what was thewre in Cold war times.Only other place was England and apart from the few USAF bases there like Mildenhall,they havent been there much either since 1945.
Get some facts before you show yourself up to be more ignorant by posting such shite!
look up a history book.There are damn few places where The "yankee occupier" is or was in Europe.They were mostly in Germany,southern half.Now there are only somthing like 10% of the original strengthof what was thewre in Cold war times.Only other place was England and apart from the few USAF bases there like Mildenhall,they havent been there much either since 1945.
Get some facts before you show yourself up to be more ignorant by posting such shite!