North Korea Increases Aid to Russia, Mos... Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
Trump Assembles a War Cabinet Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
Slavgrinder Ramps Up Into Overdrive Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:29 | Marko Marjanovi?
?Existential? Culling to Continue on Com... Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:28 | Marko Marjanovi?
US to Deploy Military Contractors to Ukr... Sun Nov 10, 2024 02:37 | Field Empty Anti-Empire >>
A bird's eye view of the vineyard
Alternative Copy of thesaker.is site is available Thu May 25, 2023 14:38 | Ice-Saker-V6bKu3nz Alternative site: https://thesaker.si/saker-a... Site was created using the downloads provided Regards Herb
The Saker blog is now frozen Tue Feb 28, 2023 23:55 | The Saker Dear friends As I have previously announced, we are now “freezing” the blog.? We are also making archives of the blog available for free download in various formats (see below).?
What do you make of the Russia and China Partnership? Tue Feb 28, 2023 16:26 | The Saker by Mr. Allen for the Saker blog Over the last few years, we hear leaders from both Russia and China pronouncing that they have formed a relationship where there are
Moveable Feast Cafe 2023/02/27 ? Open Thread Mon Feb 27, 2023 19:00 | cafe-uploader 2023/02/27 19:00:02Welcome to the ‘Moveable Feast Cafe’. The ‘Moveable Feast’ is an open thread where readers can post wide ranging observations, articles, rants, off topic and have animate discussions of
The stage is set for Hybrid World War III Mon Feb 27, 2023 15:50 | The Saker Pepe Escobar for the Saker blog A powerful feeling rhythms your skin and drums up your soul as you?re immersed in a long walk under persistent snow flurries, pinpointed by The Saker >>
Interested in maladministration. Estd. 2005
RTEs Sarah McInerney ? Fianna Fail?supporter? Anthony
Joe Duffy is dishonest and untrustworthy Anthony
Robert Watt complaint: Time for decision by SIPO Anthony
RTE in breach of its own editorial principles Anthony
Waiting for SIPO Anthony Public Inquiry >>
Promoting Human Rights in IrelandHuman Rights in Ireland >>
|
Where we are, Where we want to go, How we get there
national |
rights, freedoms and repression |
opinion/analysis
Wednesday April 23, 2008 20:15 by Ruairí Ó Brádaigh - RSF
Ruairí Ó Brádaigh articulates the Republican position
“How do we move from here to the position of Ireland’s national independence with the essential unity of the country and its people achieved? How do we combat the threat to our separate identity so that we survive as a distinct people to cooperate with the former colonised nations and advance the cause of humankind in general? How do we progress towards building the Democratic Socialist Republic?
WHERE WE ARE NOW, WHERE WE WANT TO GO AND HOW TO GET THERE
SPEAKING at the Ireland Institute, Pearse Centre, Dublin on April 17, Ruairí Ó Brádaigh, President of Republican Sinn Féin, said:
“Ian Paisley is retiring with his mission accomplished. He has strengthened British rule in Ireland.
“Interviewed on BBC radio One “Andrew Marr Show” on March 9, Mr Paisley said: ‘I did smash them [the Provos] because I took away their main plank. Their main plank was that they would not recognise the British government [in Ireland].
“ ‘Now they are in part of the British government. They can’t be true Republicans when they now accept the right of Britain to govern this country and take part in that government.’
“Vincent Browne in his ‘Nightly News’ on TV3 last week put it clearly. He said in effect that the nationalist view had been rejected and the unionist position had been accepted. The nationalist standpoint was that the people of Ireland as a whole should determine the future of Ireland.
“He continued: ‘The Unionist position was that the majority in the Six Counties should decide the future. We have all become unionists,’ he added.
“Bertie Ahern, for his part, put it quite blatantly on RTÉ Radio One on Sunday, April 6, when he said that Stormont was in position for the foreseeable future; that English rule would remain so long as the unionists desired it.
“He said that this would be for a very long time and if in the end it did not change, then we must put up with it. His words were: ‘people will just have to be tolerant of that’.
“Meanwhile a tide of Anglicisation was sweeping through the country in support of the new and strengthened institutions of English rule. Our culture and civilisation, to which the Irish language was central, must be accessible to all our people. Yet in Stormont, in spite of the St Andrew’s Agreement, An Ghaeilge is officially derided and condemned.
British forces and 26-Country forces were increasingly involved in joint commemorations and celebrations. Croke Park is now the venue for England teams and the English National Anthem is played in an unfree Ireland.
“British Royals are made welcome even as they claim the right to rule part of our country. Politicians cannot wait for the Crowned head of England to be officially received in Dublin for the first time in 100 years. Nationally-minded people must protest at such an intrusion if they are to be faithful and true to the spirit of 1916.
“In the wider world we must continue opposition to the landing and re-fuelling of American warplanes at Shannon Airport and the use of Irish airspace in furtherance of an Imperialist war in Iraq.
“These breaches of Irish neutrality are clearly against the wishes of the Irish people. They are in support of an illegal war undertaken in defiance of the United Nations.
“Also we are being asked to accept the Lisbon Treaty which is 95-96% the EU Constitution rejected by the people of France and Holland. This tightening of the EU grip must be opposed as must the EU “battlegroups” which have been described as a “standing army for Europe”.
“Robert Fisk in his interview with Vincent Browne on April 8 described the 26 Counties joining the partnership for Peace without a referendum as “slipping into NATO”. This was done by Fianna Fáil in defiance of their own Election Manifesto. So much for triple locks to safeguard neutrality!
“In the matter of the referenda in 1998 on the Stormont Agreement and the amendment of Articles 2 and 3, both Mo Mowlam and Patrick Mayhew said that ‘the vote in the Six Counties would be decisive’.
“On both sides of the Border the choice put to the people was ‘a vote for war or for peace’. Liam Mellows speaking on the Treaty of Surrender in 1922 put it well: ‘This is not the will of the people. It is the fear of the people.’
“The great unanswered question before history of why did not Paisley on the one hand and the present Provo leadership on the other accept and work the Sunningdale Agreement of 1973 which offered more and for which less was to be paid than the 1998 Belfast Agreement?
“Did we, as a people, have to endure 25 years more of sacrifice and suffering until both elements were poised to divide the major share of the spoils of office between them?
“How do we move from here to the position of Ireland’s national independence with the essential unity of the country and its people achieved? How do we combat the threat to our separate identity so that we survive as a distinct people to cooperate with the former colonised nations and advance the cause of humankind in general? How do we progress towards building the Democratic Socialist Republic?
“First we must admit to ourselves that Paisley and the British have succeeded in the Six Counties and are working at extending their influence in the 26 Counties.
“Secondly, we must acknowledge and realise the lesson of history that in spite of the betrayals Irish people will always be found to resist English rule here and inevitably the British government will be compelled to leave Ireland. The spirit of 1916 will finally triumph.
“But none of these objectives will be achieved without the support of the people. Therefore we must organise among the people and build a mass movement. Imperialism in all its forms must be recognised and opposed at every turn.
“Above all we must educate our people politically. This is a massive task but it must be faced and undertaken. Contrary to what many sincere people would like there is no short cut in this matter. And the power of the mass media in modern times makes it so much more difficult.
“The lines must be kept open to the people of unionist orientation. At all times it is necessary to convey to them that it is not proposed or intended that they should be a permanent political minority in an independent Ireland. We cannot allow the notion to prevail that we seek to back them on to a cliff edge politically. If we do they will oppose us all the more vehemently, making our task all the more difficult.
“During the 1970s the ÉIRE NUA proposals were put to representatives of all shades of unionism at meetings which were on the basis of confidentiality and discretion. When it was put to them as to what would be their option if the English government decided to leave Ireland in spite of their wishes, they invariably replied that the ‘Ireland of the four provinces’ would be their second choice.
“Their first preference would be, of course, an independent Six-County state, but we countered that this would not be viable. It is necessary to make clear that the new four-province federal Ireland proposed would include a nine-County Ulster in which – on present voting patterns – the unionists would have a working majority, but that the nationalists would be right behind them within reach of power.
“With optimum devolution of power and decision-making within the provinces, strong regional boards and powerful district councils would be organised according to the principle of subsidiarity of function – that the services would be administered at the lowest level possible consistent with efficiency. In Ulster this would make for a patchwork quilt of control in accordance with local majorities.
“Of course, the idea would be to get away eventually from the unionist versus nationalist situation and have a class-based politics where the distribution of wealth in the community would be the priority.
“In this connection every effort should be made even now to bridge the gap on the basis of social, economic and local issues, however difficult this may be. Even in the past year some local unionist community leaders have shown an interest in “provincial government” as they termed it as an alternative to the present Stormont set-up.
“The way forward is clear as to how ÉIRE NUA could be implemented following a British government Declaration of Intent to quit Ireland: the election of an all-Ireland Constituent Assembly with the sole task of drafting a new constitution; this constitution to be put to the people in a single 32-County referendum; following its adoption new elections to the various levels of power in the New Ireland would take place.
“Such steps are just commonsense. The real and enormous task is to campaign, agitate and build support for such a programme based on Republican, socialist and environmental principles. To show the inadequacies and failures of the existing system, to present an alternative and above all to avoid misrepresentation of our position, these are our duties.”
|
View Comments Titles Only
save preference
Comments (5 of 5)
Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5Ahernes legacy will be remembered fondly im sure for ....'all he has done for peace in our country'...' bringing both sides together...'
Just like Haughey, his legacy will need constant rehabilitation over the years to continnue to reinforce the 'positives' and Ignore the negatives to give us a lasting image, all provided by their propaganda machine-RTE.
A nation claiming political soverigenty when occupied is an injustice to logic let alone its own people. And to invite one of the most corrupt crime families whos ancestoral past to present times is responsible for untold misery and incalculable deaths throughout the globe with its bloody and vicious past, including most of Irelands troubles today, is an insult to anyone with the slightes notion of being Irish.
Im not lost in the past as is so often said of people who make such suggestions, but without stopping still in time for a moment and learning from the failings we are bound to repeat them which is happening today as we speak.
There is no notion of attributing responsibility for past crimes associated with our own past and as such there is no accountability.
Not only is Bertie a political coward along with his cabinet, they also are now engaged in the world theatre of undermining democracy, and democracys the world over by participating in the buly game that John Bull had used in this country for centuries.
Instead of looking for solutions to world problems by learning from our very own expierence they now act like them, talk like them, and lie like them and have willingly become part of the problem.
This government supports everything this country used to stand against and was formed with that foremost in mind, imperilaism, privatisation, oppression, classism......
As the british watched the Irish starve in 1847, three ships loaded with food landed in Dublin from Iraq. It was turned away by the British. Now we, the Irish along with the British and the US watched 1.2 million Iraqi starve to death with sanctions we imposed on the innocent people of Iraq and then we sent in the military after disarming them three times before we invaded. Now theres another 1.2 million dead, 500,000 widows and 5,000,000 orphans.......
....there must be another way.......
The majority of people in Northern Ireland are Unionist, of British ancestry and want to remain in the United Kingdom. The minority in Northern Ireland who are Nationalist and Irish have to accept the democratic will of the majority.
Unless your suggesting continuing the Troubles?
The IRA campaign was an utter failure.
There was never any chance that the Unionists would ever agree to United Ireland by force.
The only way there is ever going to be a United Ireland is if by some miracle the Unionists suddenly change their minds or else the Unionist population is ethnically cleansed.
Both are a complete non-runner.
Thousands of British troops were needed to patrol the streets and countryside of Northern Ireland when civil disturbance and terrorism were at their height.
If the British withdrew from Northern Ireland the Unionists would set up their own state before they would join a United Ireland they would fight any attempt at Unification of the island without their consent.
An Irish Army occupation of Northern Ireland would lead to a loyalist insurrection and loyalist terrorism against the south.
The Irish public would quickly tire of an unpopular war with heavy military and civilian casualties and the severe economic problems that would inevitably result.
noone is spoke of war but yourself.
It is the elephant in the room.
There is not a snowball's chance in hell that the unionists are going to agree to a United Ireland.
Twice you missed the point.....third times a charm